After all, it would live on foreign that people oftentimes paid past times tax-payers (directly or indirectly), spending their fourth dimension doing enquiry mainly funded past times Blue Planet mitt in addition to published inwards a mag where most of the time-consuming run is done voluntarily in addition to unpaid past times other researchers should have got gratis access to the results of such enquiry without paying around other 3000 bucks for it. Because this is what Elsevier charges for "Gold" Open Access.
 |
| This is how responsible sharing looks like. I hope, I'm allowed to part this, couldn't notice anything inwards the FAQ most sharing the Coalitions' icon. Tentatively, I'll assume it is. Please allow me know if a © is missing if not. |
Well, at nowadays that our results are securely hidden behind paywalls again, thank yous to the caring in addition to skilful run of the Coalition, peradventure Blue Planet that paid for it wants to know the reason. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 newspaper which, past times the way, illuminated a two-decade ongoing scientific discipline fraud. It in addition to its sister paper (which was published inwards an opened upward access-transparent peer review journal) may non have got ended it, but made it to a greater extent than hard to larn it through without primary documentation of the used data.
Here's Elsevier's courtesy shipping service inwards total (additions past times me inwards []).
[received 24/8/2018]
For your information only; no activeness necessary.
Dear Guido W. Grimm,
Regarding your article: Fables in addition to foibles: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 critical analysis of the Palaeoflora database in addition to the Coexistence Approach for palaeoclimate reconstruction [here's the link to the bioRxiv pre-print for those without access to Elsevier's World of Valuable Scientific Knowledge; and here's the opened upward data-archive – Elsevier couldn't deal putting it upward dorsum then, likewise large — 8 MB; incorrect form of files — entirely PDF were allowed. So much for professional person scientific discipline publisher beingness inwards concern for one-half a millennium...]
Published in: Review of Palaeobotany in addition to Palynology [not recommendable anymore, non fifty-fifty for fringe scientists similar me]
Publication year: 2016
[submitted 9/3/15; outset determination received 1/6/16!!! – come across also One engagement missing inwards most scientific publications, related to the politics affecting shadow peer review processes — the latter a full general feat of Coalition journals; revision submitted 23/6/16; terminal determination 1/7/16; published online, non proof-set yet in addition to pitted past times errors: 2/7/16.
Finally pass an entire calendar week correcting all the errors inwards the proof-PDF which arrived much later; also contacted them regarding the online version — e.g. all internal references were fucked up, the reference reformatted to an Elsevier mode non used past times the journal; 80% of the errors inwards the proof were inserted past times Elsevier's sure enough highly paid in addition to qualified employees, who – on the other mitt – didn't caught a unmarried of the errors inwards our finally submitted version, such equally missing closing brackets etc.]
I am writing to yous amongst regards to the scholarly collaboration network ResearchGate that currently hosts, modifies [?!] in addition to distributes large numbers of mag articles without permission or license. [Oh, no.]
Following numerous unsuccessful attempts to handgrip an approach amongst ResearchGate [well, it happened behind walls, but I suppose it had to create amongst money] to facilitate the sharing of articles inwards ways that abide by the publishing agreements betwixt journals in addition to authors, inwards accordance amongst the STM Association’s Voluntary Principles for Article Sharing on Scholarly Collaboration Networks, ResearchGate has requested that publishers number have got downwards notices (TDNs) for articles which it should non live on hosting. [I noticed. I also got a mail from the High German lawyers who took downwards the newspaper – is this the skilful ole' good-cop-bad-cop thing?]
For your information only; no activeness necessary.
Dear Guido W. Grimm,
Regarding your article: Fables in addition to foibles: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 critical analysis of the Palaeoflora database in addition to the Coexistence Approach for palaeoclimate reconstruction [here's the link to the bioRxiv pre-print for those without access to Elsevier's World of Valuable Scientific Knowledge; and here's the opened upward data-archive – Elsevier couldn't deal putting it upward dorsum then, likewise large — 8 MB; incorrect form of files — entirely PDF were allowed. So much for professional person scientific discipline publisher beingness inwards concern for one-half a millennium...]
Published in: Review of Palaeobotany in addition to Palynology [not recommendable anymore, non fifty-fifty for fringe scientists similar me]
Publication year: 2016
[submitted 9/3/15; outset determination received 1/6/16!!! – come across also One engagement missing inwards most scientific publications, related to the politics affecting shadow peer review processes — the latter a full general feat of Coalition journals; revision submitted 23/6/16; terminal determination 1/7/16; published online, non proof-set yet in addition to pitted past times errors: 2/7/16.
Finally pass an entire calendar week correcting all the errors inwards the proof-PDF which arrived much later; also contacted them regarding the online version — e.g. all internal references were fucked up, the reference reformatted to an Elsevier mode non used past times the journal; 80% of the errors inwards the proof were inserted past times Elsevier's sure enough highly paid in addition to qualified employees, who – on the other mitt – didn't caught a unmarried of the errors inwards our finally submitted version, such equally missing closing brackets etc.]
I am writing to yous amongst regards to the scholarly collaboration network ResearchGate that currently hosts, modifies [?!] in addition to distributes large numbers of mag articles without permission or license. [Oh, no.]
Following numerous unsuccessful attempts to handgrip an approach amongst ResearchGate [well, it happened behind walls, but I suppose it had to create amongst money] to facilitate the sharing of articles inwards ways that abide by the publishing agreements betwixt journals in addition to authors, inwards accordance amongst the STM Association’s Voluntary Principles for Article Sharing on Scholarly Collaboration Networks, ResearchGate has requested that publishers number have got downwards notices (TDNs) for articles which it should non live on hosting. [I noticed. I also got a mail from the High German lawyers who took downwards the newspaper – is this the skilful ole' good-cop-bad-cop thing?]
Nobody expects the Coalition For Responsible Sharing https://t.co/M0TFjYbnnh … #openaccess pic.twitter.com/dlv9XVKNgA— Dan Holden (@danrholden) 12. Oktober 2017
The Coalition for Responsible Sharing [well characterised past times the tweet above; come across also this post from Oct in conclusion year when the cleansing had merely started], a grouping of several publishers, societies in addition to information analytics organizations that includes [headed by] Elsevier, has been left amongst no other alternative [like the single-blind peer review process, roofing upward such errors during in addition to after publication!]
The Coalition for Responsible Sharing [aka the Castilian Inquisition] has provided a statement explaining the activeness inwards to a greater extent than exceptional in addition to has published a listing of FAQs [please read them inwards illustration yous withal consider publishing or working for gratis for an Elsevier journal as editor or peer]. Information on how to part your articles tin live on institute at this post on my experiences amongst Coalition buddy Wiley in addition to "Bronze" Open Access].
If yous have got whatever questions [never had] or comments [see here], delight experience gratis to contact us at Author-Copyright@elsevier.com [I'm tempted to, merely to come across if i gets a quicker reply than from the Elsinders treatment our papers in addition to commonly took a calendar week or ii to answer, but non actually respond, to questions/problems nosotros had].
Thank yous for publishing inwards our mag [when nosotros submitted this one, it was entirely for sentimental reasons, I'm afraid; I promised the in addition to therefore Editor-in-Chief an add-on to our 2012 paper; in addition to dorsum inwards 2012, I didn't know improve ... likewise busy amongst science, no fourth dimension for politics] in addition to nosotros facial expression forwards to continuing our partnership amongst you. [Uh, sorry, I know it's a bad thing to interruption upward non facing each other, but obviously predatory publishers. But I'm certain yous volition create good without me, noticing the many willing horses inwards your stables (i.e. authors, peers, editors).]
Kind regards, [a fare good from my side]
Philippe Terheggen
Managing Director, STM Journals, Elsevier
The Coalition for Responsible Sharing [aka the Castilian Inquisition] has provided a statement explaining the activeness inwards to a greater extent than exceptional in addition to has published a listing of FAQs [please read them inwards illustration yous withal consider publishing or working for gratis for an Elsevier journal as editor or peer]. Information on how to part your articles tin live on institute at this post on my experiences amongst Coalition buddy Wiley in addition to "Bronze" Open Access].
If yous have got whatever questions [never had] or comments [see here], delight experience gratis to contact us at Author-Copyright@elsevier.com [I'm tempted to, merely to come across if i gets a quicker reply than from the Elsinders treatment our papers in addition to commonly took a calendar week or ii to answer, but non actually respond, to questions/problems nosotros had].
Thank yous for publishing inwards our mag [when nosotros submitted this one, it was entirely for sentimental reasons, I'm afraid; I promised the in addition to therefore Editor-in-Chief an add-on to our 2012 paper; in addition to dorsum inwards 2012, I didn't know improve ... likewise busy amongst science, no fourth dimension for politics] in addition to nosotros facial expression forwards to continuing our partnership amongst you. [Uh, sorry, I know it's a bad thing to interruption upward non facing each other, but obviously predatory publishers. But I'm certain yous volition create good without me, noticing the many willing horses inwards your stables (i.e. authors, peers, editors).]
Kind regards, [a fare good from my side]
Philippe Terheggen
Managing Director, STM Journals, Elsevier
Related posts amongst farther links dealing amongst the reality of scientific publishing in addition to on how the Coalition or other high-profit publishers misuse the electrical current scheme tin live on institute nether the tags #FightTheFog, bad science, free science (like inwards Free Willy), public interest (after all yous pay for it, in addition to I was paid past times you), in addition to science-related ('cause it's non most but affects science).
Links
- the official homepage of the Coalition for Responsible Sharing
- the Coalition's twitter account (greater bummer than mine, it seems)
- ResearchGate
0 Response to "I Constitute Mail! From Elsevier, Together With Inward My Junk Folder (Where It Belongs)"